leave us a review!
want to be a guest?
Fill out the form on the inquiry page under the podcast tab and we'll get in touch with you!
We love hearing from you about your thoughts on the podcast, you can leave a review on apple!
resources for designers
Visit our For Designers page to look through all of our resources available or you!
Featured on this episode:
What you will learn from this episode:
There’s a quiet assumption in the interior design industry that if you’re an interior designer, you should already know how to handle construction.
It’s part of the job, right?
You specify the tile, the plumbing fixtures, the cabinetry. You answer the contractor’s questions. You go to the job site. You communicate changes to the client. You solve problems when something inevitably comes up.
And eventually, you figure it out, but you keep losing money along the way.
But there’s something I wish more designers understood before they get too far into this work:
Managing construction is not more design. It is a completely different body of work.
And once you really understand that, it changes how you build your scope of work, how you price your fees, and ultimately, how profitable your practice can be.
This is how it usually happens.
You start by doing specifications. Then a contractor has a question, so you answer it. Maybe you’re coordinating a few trades. Then you’re solving a problem on site. Then you’re communicating the change to the client.
None of those things seem particularly significant on their own.
But add them together over the course of a project, and suddenly you’re managing a substantial portion of the construction process without ever making a deliberate decision about whether that is actually part of your role.
And because it happened gradually, you may never have named it.
You didn’t scope it.
You didn’t price it.
You just did it.
That is where things get dangerous for your profitability.
Because once a designer becomes the person everyone relies on to keep the project moving, the distinction between consulting and managing becomes incredibly important.
Consulting means you’re weighing in when you’re asked.
Management means you’re actively overseeing what is happening. You’re participating in weekly meetings, tracking the project, anticipating what’s coming next, communicating with the team, and helping hold the process together.
Those are different responsibilities.
They require different amounts of time and availability.
And they should have different fees.
A designer might say, “But I specified everything. Isn’t that construction management?”
Not necessarily.
Specifications are incredibly valuable, but construction doesn’t stop once you’ve selected the tile. The specified tile gets discontinued. A contractor needs clarification about a rough-in location. Something is discovered behind a wall. A decision needs to be made that wasn’t anticipated in the original drawings.
And because you’re the person who understands the design intent, the client trusts you, and you were involved in the selections, you naturally get pulled into those conversations.
That’s the reality of construction. The question isn’t whether those things will happen. The question is whether you have deliberately decided what your role will be when they do.
Because if you haven’t, you can very easily find yourself managing a project while billing as though you’re simply consulting.
And every hour you absorb that wasn’t included in your fee is profitability leaving the building.
I used to bill hourly, and for a while, it was mostly okay.
I understand why designers like the idea of hourly billing. It feels safe. If the project takes longer, you simply bill for the additional time.
Except we all know what actually happens.
We shave our hours.
We round down.
We decide that 30 minutes wasn’t really worth billing.
We answer the email quickly and don’t track it.
We make an extra site visit and think, “I’ll just absorb this one.”
And then there is all of the work that happens around the obvious work: travel, administration, phone calls, emails, contractor conversations, and the fifteen-message email thread that somehow took three days to resolve.
If you’re not tracking that time in real time, it effectively disappears.
Someone recently compared tracking your hours to tracking your food intake. If you don’t write it down, it didn’t exist.
Except in this case, what’s disappearing isn’t calories. It’s money.
There’s another problem with hourly billing that I think designers need to consider.
The better you become at your work, the more efficiently you can do it.
That’s a good thing—unless you’re billing strictly by the hour. Because on an hourly model, becoming more efficient can actually mean you earn less for the same level of expertise. That doesn’t make sense.
Your expertise should become more valuable as you develop it, not less. This is one reason I believe so strongly in building a fee from a clearly defined scope of work. The order matters.
Scope of work first.
Then level of involvement.
Then estimated hours.
Then the fee.
Not the other way around.
I recently had a designer ask me what she should charge for construction management. My first question was, “What have you agreed to manage?”
Because without knowing that, there isn’t a right answer. Any number would simply be a guess. And guesses have a way of compounding.
I know scope of work can sound like a documentation exercise.
It’s not.
It’s a profitability tool.
A true scope of work tells your client what you’re doing and what you’re not doing. It helps the contractor understand your role. Most importantly, it tells you what you’re responsible for.
And once you know what you’re responsible for, you can determine how much time the project is actually going to require.
That gives you something to build your fee around. Without it, you’re guessing. And when designers guess, they tend to underestimate.
Part of that is because we assume the client won’t understand the number. We imagine the pushback before the client has even said anything. So we make the fee a little smaller, just in case.
I’ve seen this happen over and over.
But the real issue isn’t simply that the fee is too low.
It’s that the designer didn’t have enough information to feel confident in the fee in the first place.
This is why I don’t think a construction management process is simply about staying organized.
Yes, forms and templates and checklists are useful. I use them myself.
But a good process does something much more important: it helps you make better decisions.
Should you take the discovery call?
Is this project actually a fit for your practice?
Do you need to visit the site?
What do you need to know before you can write the scope of work?
What level of involvement is the client actually expecting?
How much communication will this particular client require?
What will your role be once construction begins?
And ultimately, are you confident enough in the information you’ve gathered to put a fee in front of the client?
Every one of those is a decision point.
At each point, you either have the information you need—or you’re guessing.
And I don’t want you guessing by the time you get to the proposal.
I want you to have gathered enough information that the number on the page makes sense to you before it ever gets in front of the client. That is a very different kind of confidence.
We talk about red flags constantly in the design industry.
The client who calls at midnight. The person who immediately disputes your invoice. The person who tells you every designer they’ve ever hired was terrible.
Those are pretty obvious.
But I think we need to talk more about pink flags. They’re much more subtle.
Maybe there’s a slight edge in the client’s voice when budget comes up.
Maybe they’re incredibly enthusiastic about the design but become vague when you start asking how decisions will be made during construction.
Maybe they mention having communication problems with contractors in the past.
None of those things automatically means you have a problem client. But pink flags can accumulate. And when they do, they’re often telling you something about what the project is actually going to require from you.
There is another reason I want designers to think seriously about construction management.
The interior design industry is changing.
AI is generating room concepts, mood boards, and product recommendations faster and more cheaply than ever. Trade access, which used to be a meaningful differentiator, is increasingly available to consumers who know where to look.
And when people become uncertain about money, decorating is a luxury expense that can be postponed.
I’m not saying decorating is going away. It isn’t.
I’m saying designers need to be deliberate about what they want their practices to be built on.
Construction management is one potential strategic lever.
It isn’t the entire answer, and it won’t solve every business problem.
But construction itself is different from decorating in an important way: when a client commits to a renovation or new build, they’re making a significant investment in their home. And once a project is permitted and contracted, it generally has momentum.
Someone still needs to manage that investment.
Someone needs to communicate, coordinate, anticipate, document, and help keep the project moving.
That work has value.
And it requires a professional who understands what they’re actually taking responsibility for.
There is nothing wrong with learning through experience.
In fact, some of the most valuable lessons you’ll ever learn will come from a project that didn’t go exactly the way you expected.
But eventually, experience needs to become process.
If every new project requires you to reinvent how you evaluate the client, determine your scope, price the work, and decide what you’re willing to manage, that’s exhausting.
You’re always catching up.
And catching up is expensive.
It’s expensive in time. It’s expensive in energy. And it can be incredibly expensive in profitability.
So I want you to think about your last construction management project.
What did you know when you presented the proposal?
What did you learn after the project started that you wish you had known beforehand?
Maybe you learned how much communication that particular client needed.
Maybe the scope was larger than you understood.
Maybe the project required far more site involvement than your fee reflected.
Maybe you absorbed hours you never billed for.
Maybe there were pink flags you talked yourself out of.
Whatever your answer is, that gap is the thing.
It’s the distance between what you knew going in and what you needed to know.
And that’s the gap your process should help you close.
Construction management isn’t necessarily complicated.
It’s specific.
It asks specific things of you, and when you treat it like the distinct body of work that it is, everything starts to become clearer.
Your scope becomes clearer. Your role becomes clearer. Your fee becomes easier to determine. Your clients know what to expect.
And you can show up to the project with confidence instead of hoping everything will work itself out.
Most importantly, you’re no longer allowing construction management to quietly creep into your business and take your profitability with it.
You’re choosing it deliberately.
And that is a very different way to build an interior design practice.
Like this Episode?
Be sure to check out Episode #296: What Interior Designers Really Get From Construction Management Coaching
Be sure to check out Episode #211: Spot the Pink Flags Before They Turn Red: Planning Your 2025 Projects
Be sure to check out Episode #271: Why Charging Hourly Penalizes Your Expertise (And What to Do Instead)
follow the podcast
want to be a guest?
Fill out the form on the inquiry page under the podcast tab and we'll get in touch with you!
leave us a review!
We love hearing from you about your thoughts on the podcast, you can leave a review on apple!
You can find us anywhere! Click the icons to find us on the podcast platform you use!