Featured on this episode:

• Join The Designers Edge waitlist here
• Grab Your Free Script Guide here
• Access the full video interview with Elana Steele of Steele Appliance here

What you will learn from this episode:

• Why construction management should always be priced separately from design
• What interior designers consistently forget to account for in their fees
• How to introduce construction management pricing before the proposal stage

---

There is a feeling I think a lot of designers know intimately.

You finish a construction project after months of site meetings, contractor conversations, client questions, change orders, unexpected problems, and hundreds of decisions. Then you finally look at what you were paid for all of that work, and something feels off.

The number doesn’t match the effort.

When that happens, it’s easy to assume the solution is efficiency. Maybe you need better systems. Maybe you spent too much time on the project. Maybe you need to work faster or take on more projects next year.

But I don’t think efficiency is usually the real problem.

I think a lot of interior designers are pricing construction management as though it’s simply another piece of the design process, when in reality it is an entirely separate body of work. Until we start treating it that way—mentally, structurally, and financially—we’re going to continue undercharging for some of the most demanding and valuable work we do.

Construction Management Is Not Design Work

Most of us learned how to price our businesses around design services. We’re accounting for concept development, drawings, selections, sourcing, presentations, specifications, revisions, and all of the other work required to develop the design.

Then our projects get larger.

We start taking on renovations and new construction, and suddenly we’re doing much more than designing the space. We’re attending site meetings, answering contractor questions, reviewing what’s being installed, managing changes, communicating with trades, solving problems, and helping the client navigate decisions throughout construction.

Yet instead of creating a separate fee for that work, designers often take their existing design fee and add a little more to it. Maybe they estimate a few additional hours or simply increase the overall number because they know the project will require more involvement.

That’s where I think we’re getting ourselves into trouble.

Construction management isn’t just more design work. It requires a different kind of responsibility and a completely different level of availability.

You’re Not Just Charging for Your Time. You’re Charging for Your Availability.

This is the piece I think designers underestimate the most.

Much of your design work can be scheduled. You can block time to work on drawings, source materials, prepare presentations, or review specifications.

Construction doesn’t operate that way.

If the contractor opens a wall and discovers something unexpected, the project may need an answer that day. If the electrician has a question before moving forward, he can’t necessarily wait until Thursday afternoon when you have an opening in your calendar.

That’s the reality of managing a construction project. You’re working within live conditions, and part of the value you provide is being available to make educated decisions that keep the project moving.

Think about what the alternative looks like for the homeowner. Without someone who understands both the design intent and the construction process, they’re suddenly fielding those calls themselves. They’re trying to interpret questions they may not understand, coordinate conversations between people they’ve never worked with, and make decisions that could affect everything that comes afterward.

When you’re managing that process for them, you’re not simply “checking in” on construction. You’re removing an enormous responsibility from their plate while protecting the project they’ve hired you to create.

That has value.

Your Client Isn’t Paying Twice

I think this is where some designers get uncomfortable.

If the client is already paying a general contractor, why should they also pay the designer for construction management? Doesn’t that feel like they’re paying two people to manage the same project?

No. Because they’re paying for two entirely different areas of expertise.

The contractor is responsible for building the project. Your responsibility is to help protect the design intent while navigating the countless decisions that happen between demolition and completion.

You’re answering questions, catching potential problems, reviewing changes, coordinating communication, and making sure that what is being built actually reflects what was designed. You’re also helping the client understand what’s happening so they aren’t responsible for translating every contractor question or deciding how a change on site affects the rest of the design.

Once you look at it that way, construction management stops feeling like something you need to defend.

It’s a professional service.

The Pricing Conversation Should Start Before the Proposal

One mistake I see designers make is waiting until the proposal to explain construction management.

By then, you’re asking a document to do far too much work.

If construction management is an important part of your business, clients should begin understanding that before they ever see your fee. Your website should make it clear that you work on construction projects and that managing the construction phase is a service you provide.

That conversation should continue during discovery. When you’re talking about the project, you have an opportunity to explain what your involvement looks like once construction begins and why that involvement matters.

Then, when the proposal arrives, the client isn’t suddenly wondering what this additional fee is for. You’ve already educated them about the service. The proposal is simply putting a number around something they understand.

I think that distinction matters because the proposal should confirm the conversation you’ve already had—not introduce an entirely new concept.

Your website also becomes part of that filtering process. If someone is looking for a designer who will hand over drawings and disappear, they may realize you’re not the right fit. That’s okay. I’d much rather discover that before spending hours on discovery calls and proposals.

Have You Actually Calculated the Work?

Here’s where this gets interesting.

Most designers know they’re doing a lot during construction, but they haven’t necessarily sat down and named all of it.

You might have a pre-construction meeting and then weekly site meetings for the duration of the project. You’re communicating with the contractor between those meetings, reviewing submittals and change orders, updating the client, discussing scheduling, documenting decisions, solving unexpected problems, and eventually managing punch lists and final walkthroughs.

That’s before anything goes wrong.

Take a relatively straightforward four- or five-month renovation. You’re already looking at roughly 16 to 20 weeks of construction, which could mean 16 to 20 regular site meetings.

But a site meeting isn’t simply the hour you spend standing in the house.

There’s the time you spend preparing beforehand. There may be drawings or specifications you need to review. You have drive time to and from the project, the meeting itself, and then whatever follow-up comes out of it. Maybe you need to email the client, call a vendor, update a drawing, document a decision, or answer another contractor question.

Suddenly that one-hour site meeting represents several hours of your time.

Now multiply that across 16 or 20 weeks.

And that’s assuming nothing unexpected happens during demolition, no installation needs additional oversight, no trade has a question outside the weekly meeting, and no client changes their mind.

We all know that’s not how construction works.

The Math Can Be Humbling

When I walk designers through this exercise inside The Designer’s Edge, there is usually a moment when they look at the number and realize just how much work they’ve been giving away.

And I understand why.

Until you separate construction management from design, all of those hours tend to disappear into the project. You remember the site meetings, but maybe you don’t account for the 30-minute contractor call afterward. You remember reviewing the change order, but not the email exchange with the client that followed it.

Individually, those things don’t feel significant. Across a five-month project, they’re enormous.

Let’s say you honestly calculate the project and discover that you’re spending 40 or 50 hours managing construction. Multiply that by the value of your professional time.

Now compare that number to whatever amount you quietly folded into your design fee.

For a lot of designers, those numbers aren’t even close.

That’s the gap we’re trying to fix.

Separate the Project Into Two Phases

I think there’s a much cleaner way to structure this.

Think about the project in two distinct phases: pre-construction and construction management.

Pre-construction is where you’re developing the design. You’re creating drawings, making selections, sourcing, preparing specifications, presenting to the client, and doing the work required to get the project ready to build.

Once construction begins, your role changes.

Now you’re providing oversight, attending site meetings, coordinating communication, answering contractor questions, reviewing changes, documenting decisions, solving problems, and helping carry the project through completion.

Those aren’t arbitrary divisions created so you can charge another fee. They’re genuinely different phases of the project requiring different types of work.

Separating them also makes your proposal easier for the client to understand. They can see what they’re paying for during design and what they’re paying for once construction begins.

Clarity helps everyone.

Don’t Let the Proposal Speak for You

While we’re talking about proposals, I want to touch on something I feel strongly about: whenever possible, don’t simply email a proposal and hope the client understands it.

Review it with them.

I’d rather sit down in person, but Zoom works too. The important thing is that you’re there to explain how the project is structured, what each phase includes, and why you’ve priced it the way you have.

There’s another practical reason I recommend this. Often, one spouse has been your primary contact throughout the process. If you simply email the proposal, that person may end up sitting at dinner trying to explain your services and defend your fees to their spouse.

Why would you want them doing your job?

You are the best advocate for your services because you understand exactly what goes into them. Presenting the proposal yourself also gives you the opportunity to answer questions immediately, read the client’s reaction, and clear up confusion before assumptions have time to grow.

Undercharging Eventually Changes How You Serve the Client

This is the part of the conversation that goes beyond profitability.

Yes, undercharging hurts your bottom line. But over time, it also affects the way you show up on the project.

When you’ve priced construction management correctly, you don’t have to think twice about attending an additional site meeting because you’ve accounted for that level of involvement. You can respond to contractor questions without feeling as though every phone call is stealing time from another project. You have room in the fee to be proactive rather than waiting until something becomes a problem.

When you haven’t priced for that work, something very different happens.

You start rationing your time.

Maybe you decide you don’t really need to attend this week’s meeting. You hesitate before making another trip to the site. The contractor calls and, instead of seeing it as part of the work you’re being paid to perform, it starts to feel like one more interruption you’re absorbing for free.

That’s when resentment creeps in.

The client may not know why something feels different, but they can often feel the result.

Charging appropriately for construction management isn’t about squeezing more money out of a project. It’s about creating enough room in the fee to provide the level of service you’re promising.

Construction Management Is a Professional Service

This is what I really want designers to walk away understanding.

Construction management is not something you throw into a project because you’re already the designer. It’s not a bonus service, a favor for the client, or simply one of the things you do because you’re on a construction site anyway.

It requires expertise, judgment, leadership, communication, and a significant amount of your time.

Treat it accordingly.

Start talking about construction management on your website. Explain it during discovery. Define it clearly in your scope of work. Calculate the actual time the project will require instead of guessing. Then separate that work from the design phase so your client can clearly understand what they’re paying for.

And please stop apologizing for it.

Because when you finally account for the work you’re actually doing, something changes. You’re no longer trying to squeeze site meetings, contractor calls, and real-time problem solving into a design fee that was never built to support them.

You have the space to do the job well.

Your client gets a designer who can stay engaged throughout construction instead of quietly worrying about every additional hour.

And you get to finish the project knowing the number you were paid actually reflects the work you performed.

That’s not overcharging.

That’s building a sustainable design business.

---

Like this Episode?

Be sure to check out Episode #131: Building with Numbers: The Art of Pricing Construction Projects

Be sure to check out Episode #147: Pricing a Project: Best Practices with Lesley Myrick

Be sure to check out Episode #149: Pricing with Confidence Starts with Knowing Your Value